Wednesday, August 28, 2013

our son of a bitch

"Yes, he is a son of a bitch, but he is our son of a bitch".
This line goes way back to WWII. It has been attributed to:
  • Franklin Roosevelt on US General George S. Patton.
  • Winston Churchill on the man Patton loved to dislike (and vice versa), British General Bernard "Monty" Montgomery.
  • Either or both of them on Charles De Gaulle. Take your pick.
Variations go back further than that. It is claimed that Acheson said this about Tito; And that Dulles said it about Somoza, the son of the son of a bitch of Roosevelt.

Speaking of brutal Nicaraguan dictator Somoza, Harry Truman is supposed to have said "He's a bastard, but he's our bastard." This quote is attributed to Truman, FDR, and Nixon. This is a broad chronological range. There were actuall three Somozas: Anastasio Somoza Garcia, who fathered Luis Somoza Debayle and Anastasio Somoza Debayle, and the Somoza dynasty that ruled Nicaragua from the mid 1930s through the late 1970s.

The Marines invaded Nicaragua in 1912 and stayed until 1933, fighting but never defeating the revolutionary Augusto Sandino. They created the Nicaraguan National Guard and installed Anastasio Somoza Garcia in power. Then Sandino, who had signed a truce and put down his arms, was assassinated by Somoza. In 1935, General Smedley Butler, who led the Marines into Nicaragua, said: "[I was] a high class muscle man for big business, for Wall Street and for the banks. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism - I helped purify Nicaragua for [an] international banking house." President Franklin Delano Roosevelt put it another way. "Somoza may be a son of a bitch, but he's our son of a bitch."

Corruption, torture, and wholesale murder of dissidents continued for 45 years under two generations of Somozas, for after Somoza Garcia was gunned down in the streets in 1956, his son Anastasio Somoza Debayle took control. The Somozas plundered Nicaragua and became millionaires. The younger Somoza, "the vampire dictator," made $12 million a year buying the blood of his people and selling it abroad at a 300% mark-up, but his biggest single rip-off occurred in 1972 after an earthquake killed and wounded hundreds of thousands of Nicaraguans: Somoza had his National Guard seize $30 million in international relief supplies and sold them to the highest bidder. Near the end of his reign, he aerially bombed his own capital to stay in power, but he was overthrown in 1979 by a rebel group who called themselves the Sandinistas, after the revolutionary hero his father had slain.

Time Magazine printed the following in its 15 November 1948 issue:
In 1939 [Anastasio Somoza] got himself elected for eight more years. And he went to Washington. To prime President Roosevelt for the visit, Sumner Welles sent him a long solemn memorandum about Somoza and Nicaragua. According to a story told around Washington, Roosevelt read the memo right through, wisecracked: "As a Nicaraguan might say, he's a sonofabitch but he's ours."
The basic "punchline" had been floating around Washington since well before 1939. For example, after the Chicago Convention, Gen. Hugh Johnson, who had worked hard with Barney Baruch to stop Roosevelt, was asked what he thought of his nomination. Johnson replied by recalling a story of a county convention of Democrats in which the wrong man had been chosen. Driving home from the meeting, two politicians were comparing notes. Both had opposed the successful candidate. One said to the other, "Damn it all! We should never have let them put Blank over. He's a So and So!" The other man sighed and said nothing for a long time. Then he cheered up. "After all," he observed. "Blank isn't so bad. He's our So and So."

A short piece written on the death of Senator James Watson [Indiana], the "last Republican majority leader in the Senate before the Roosevelt era," includes this telling:
Senator Watson used to tell a story of Uncle Joe which shall be our contribution to the stock of reminiscences about Jim Watson. One day in the House the Speaker spoke about a party man as a deserving appointee for some vacant post. "But you couldn't recommend him," said young Watson. "He's a so-and-so." "Yes, he may be," said Uncle Joe, "but, my boy, he's *our*
so-and so, isn't he?"
"he's a so-and-so, but he's our so-and-so" bears some resemblance to a popular anecdote said to have involved U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (Pennsylvania; 1792-1868) and cited well into the 20th century:
Speaking of the probable contests for seats in the next Congress, the Boston Herald says: "The republicans are not over scrupulous, when in power, as to the management of contested cases. In fact, their morality was well illustrated by the characteristic remark of Thad. Stevens, when it was said that both claimants of a disputed seat were 'd-----d rascals,' 'I don't
doubt it,' said the grim old 'whip,' 'but what I want to know is, which is our d-----d rascal?'
"He's a damned rascal," said Thad. Stevens bluntly on a similar occasion,
"but as he's *our* damned rascal we must put him in."

An anecdote involving "[he may be a _____,] but he's our _____" (and similar) was already pretty familiar to office-holders, political pundits, and Washington wags by the time FDR started his first term. That it had been brought out again in 1934 and applied to FDR's nomination in 1932 (consequently making FDR "our son of a bitch") must have gotten some additional notice in Washington and at the White House.

It's a little hard to know whether FDR ever really used the line in the late '30s or whether someone else just recycled the anecdote, attributing the line to the President in reference to some Latin American dictator. There is a common knowledge legend that the then director of the CIA had said of the dictator Marcos before the 1986 revolution "He may be a son of a bitch but at least he's our son of a bitch." There is a whole lot of other dictators about whom the same quote had been attributed! Batista, Pinochet, Fujimori,Mobutu, the Shah of Iran, Savimbi, Suharto, Trujillo and even Botha have been lumped into this expression.

Sunday, August 18, 2013

human rights accompaniers in Honduras

On July 25th, 2013, French citizen Orlane Vidal and Swiss citizen Daniel Langmeier, both international human rights accompaniers with the Honduran International Accompaniment Project (PROAH), were kidnapped and threatened for two and a half hours by armed guards of the mining operations of Minerales Victoria, in the community of Nueva Esperanza, Atlántida Department, Honduras. Vidal and Langmeier had met the previous day with members of Nueva Esperanza to discuss protection issues and international accompaniment for the community, which has been protesting Minerales Victoria's operations in the community. Armed men had been present in Nueva Esperanza for nearly two months prior to this kidnapping, terrorizing the community for resisting the mining activities. There has been no response from Honduran authorities and U.S. diplomatic officials, and armed men continue to be present in the community.
Next week, a 30th anniversary WFP delegation will travel to Honduras to accompany human rights defenders in various areas of the country. Delegates will document threats and violence against human rights defenders by U.S.-funded state security forces. Accompaniment of human rights defenders is a major part of WFP's work in Honduras. Tell the U.S. Embassy in Honduras and the State Department that they must be vocal in support of human rights accompaniers in Honduras, and take steps to ensure that the work of accompaniers is not underminedIf the U.S. government consistently and substantively expresses support for human rights, accompaniment has a better chance of being effective.
In solidarity,
The Witness for Peace Honduras/Nicaragua Team and Walker Grooms, National Grassroots Organizer
--
Estimad@ Arnulfo,

Saturday, August 17, 2013

the mysterious mass die-off of honey bees

the mysterious mass die-off of honey bees that pollinate $30 billion worth of crops in the US has so decimated America’s apis mellifera population that one bad winter could leave fields fallow. Now, a new study has pinpointed some of the probable causes of bee deaths and the rather scary results show that averting beemageddon will be much more difficult than previously thought. 

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Saudi human trafficking

The case of Saudi Princess Meshael Alayban, accused of human trafficking in the U.S., has caused a stir throughout the world. But do you know how the story was uncovered?
A few weeks ago, the victim, identified as 'Jane Doe,' escaped Alayban’s home where she alleges she was forced to work 16 hours a day, 7 days a week; her passport held by Alayban to prevent escape. Jane Doe then flagged down a bus, explained her situation to another passenger who helped her phone police. When the police went to investigate, they found four other women at the home claiming to be in the same situation1.
Modern slavery is a crime that survives hidden from the view of the public, but occasionally, it’s there, right in front of us. It could happen overtly – a woman escaping a home in which she was trapped or a boy summoning the courage to trust a stranger – or a more subtle scene in an airport where something just doesn’t look right. The bottom line is, at any moment, a person trapped in the nightmare of modern slavery could be trying to get our attention and we all need to be ready to help.
Hours ago, Princess Alayban was supposed to face charges of human trafficking in a California court but didn't show up. Annoyed, the judge moved her court date.

Send a message of solidarity that we all stand with the passenger on the bus who took action to protect another by ensuring millions of people know how to spot a problem AND what to do.

Sunday, June 23, 2013

poverty and terrorism

Gunmen have killed at least nine foreign tourists after storming a hotel in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, police say.

Initial reports say five are from Ukraine, one from Russia and three from China. A Pakistani woman is also said to have been killed.

The attack happened near the base camp of the Nanga Parbat Mountain, in the Diamer district of Gilgit-Baltistan.

No group has so far said it carried out the attack.

Police had at first said 10 foreign tourists were killed. The motive for the attack is not yet clear.

Part of the Himalayan Range, Nanga Parbat is one of the highest mountains in the world and a popular tourist destination.

"Unknown people entered a hotel where foreign tourists were staying last night and opened fire," Ali Sher, a senior police officer, told Reuters.

A senior official said the area had been sealed off and police were hunting for the killers.

"Since the area is very remote with no roads or transport, their bodies will have to be retrieved by helicopter," he said.

President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif have condemned the attack.

Mr Sharif, who was re-elected earlier this month, said such acts of cruelty and inhumanity would not be tolerated.

Meanwhile Gilgit governor Syed Mehdi Shah is set to hold a meeting with regional law enforcement agencies on Sunday to discuss the security situation in the area, Radio Pakistan reports.

Correspondents say Gilgit-Baltistan, which borders China, had been considered one of the more secure areas under Pakistani control.

However, in recent years it has suffered a spate of attacks by militants targeting Pakistan's Shia Muslim minority.

The area is famous for its natural beauty and the main city of Gilgit is seen as a gateway to the Karakoram and Himalayan mountain ranges.




Published on Dec 21, 2012

United Nations, December 2012 - Pakistan - it's a country rich in culture and history, but it's also a country struggling with rising threats of terrorism and in some regions, radical ideology. But now, many of Pakistan's youth are fighting back, determined to shape a future of prosperity ....and peace.
21ST CENTURY SHOW # 73

Transcript:
http://www.un.org/webcast/pdfs/21century73.pdf

Monday, June 17, 2013

HOW MANY AMERICANS CAN THE EARTH SUPPORT?



Dr. David Pimentel, Cornell University 

Based on the current growth rate, the present U.S. population of more than 270 million is projected to double to 540 million within the next 70 years. In addition, the world population -- about 6 billion -- is projected to double within just 50 years (again, based on current rates of growth). The growing imbalance between the increasing world population and the finite amount of Earth's resources that support human life is reason for grave concern.
Consider that according the World Health Organization, more than 3 billion people are currently considered malnourished. This represents the largest number and proportion of malnourished humans ever in history! Deaths from malnutrition and other diseases have significantly increased, especially during the past decade, and there is no indication that this trend will cease or reverse. What can we expect as population numbers continue to climb?
In order to support increasing numbers of people, we will need to be able to feed them. The production of adequate food depends on ample supplies of fertile cropland, pure water, energy, and other biological resources, like plants and pollinators. Growing numbers of humans, though, force us to stretch these limited resources further and further. The fact that grain production -- which supplies 80% to 90% of the world food -- has been declining since 1983 should alert us to the potential for future food supply problems and increasing malnutrition.
About 0.5 hectares (1.2 acres) of cropland per person is required to provide a diverse diet similar to that desired by the average American and European. At present, this amount of land is still available in the United States for its present population. In contrast, worldwide, only 0.27 ha of cropland per person remains for food production. Since land is a finite resource, available cropland per person will continue to decline, both worldwide and in the United States, as the human population increases. Urban sprawl, highways, and industries also spread and cover more land. Finally, a substantial amount of fertile cropland is lost to erosion by wind and water every year. Some 10 million hectares of cropland is being eroded and abandoned each year throughout the world.
Rainfall, as well as water captured in rivers and lakes, is essential for all plants, including crops. As agricultural production increases to feed more humans, pressure on water supplies also increases. Because communities, states, and countries must share water, competition for water resources increases. In arid regions of the world, which supply 30% of the world's food, irrigation has declined during the past decade. This has already had a negative impact on food production in these regions. Even in some areas of the United States, sufficient water for crops and people is becoming a serious problem. The fact that the great Agualla aquifer of central United States is being depleted about 140% faster than rainfall recharges it, suggests an impending serious water scarcity for a large area of U.S. land.
In addition to land and water resources, energy is also vital to crop production. Solar energy and human power, augmented with fossil energy, make the cultivation of crops possible. Fossil energy is used to power farm machinery and irrigation pumps as well as to produce fertilizers and pesticides. Unfortunately, fossil energy is a finite and non-renewable resource that is being rapidly depleted throughout the world.
Lastly, humans and their assorted activities are reducing biodiversity throughout the world. Pollination, essential for one-third of the world's food supply and dependent on diverse species of pollinators, has been declining; some U.S. crops already face serious problems due to lack of sufficient pollination. The stability of other essential biological resources for agriculture and forestry, such as microbes and invertebrates, are also declining and being threatened due to human activities. Finally, the use of more than 100,000 different chemicals -- including pesticides -- worldwide reduces vital biodiversity even further.
As increasing numbers of humans travel and trade more, more exotic species of plants and animals invade the U.S. and other ecosystems worldwide. Some of these exotic species become pests, which can increase food losses and frequently alter natural habitats. From 40% to 80% of agricultural pests are biological invaders, and -- despite the 5 billion pounds of pesticide applied worldwide -- more than 40% of potential food is destroyed by pests each year.
At present, humans face serious malnutrition, land degradation, water pollution and shortages, and declining fossil energy resources. In addition, with related changes in the natural environment, many thousands of species are being lost forever. If the human population increases dramatically over the next several decades, as it is projected to do, the strains on these limited resources will grow as well.
Some people are starting to ask just how many people the Earth can support if we want to cease degrading the environment and move to a sustainable solar energy system? There is no solid answer yet, but the best estimate is that Earth can support about 1 to 2 billion people with an American Standard of living, good health, nutrition, prosperity, personal dignity and freedom. This estimate suggests an optimal U.S. population of 100 to 200 million. To achieve this goal, humans must first stabilize their population and then gradually reduce their numbers to achieve a sustainable society in terms of both economics and environmental resources. With fair policies and realistic incentives, such a reduction in the human population can be achieved over the next century.

David Pimentel is a professor of ecology and agricultural science at the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-0901. His Ph.D. is from Cornell University. His research spans the fields of basic population ecology, ecological and economic aspects of pest control, biological control, biotechnology, sustainable agriculture, land and water conservation, natural resource management, and environmental policy. Pimentel has published more than 490 scientific papers and 20 books and has served on many national and government committees including the National Academy of Sciences; President's Science Advisory Council; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Energy; U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare; Office of Technology Assessment of the U.S. Congress; and the U.S. State Department. From Pop!ulation Press vol 5, # 3, March/April 1999.

http://www.populationpress.org/essays/essay-pimentel.html

http://www.globaldashboard.org/2010/11/09/how-many-people-can-the-earth-support/


http://makewealthhistory.org/2010/12/09/how-many-people-can-the-earth-support/


http://ergobalance.blogspot.com/2008/12/how-many-people-can-earth-support.html

estimates of how many people the earth can support

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpopulation

http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5686e/y5686e04.htm
http://www.enotes.com/energy-reference/energy-177831

http://www.eufic.org/article/en/health-and-lifestyle/food-choice/artid/biology-of-food-choice/

http://www.ajcn.org/content/79/1/6.full

http://www.ecofuture.org/pop/rpts/mccluney_maxpop.html

http://archive.org/details/howmanypeoplecan00cohe

mathematical cartoons human population size carrying capacity

http://www.learner.org/courses/envsci/support/guide_unit5.pdf




http://fatknowledge.blogspot.com/2008/11/how-many-people-can-earth-support.html

http://www.ecofuture.org/pop/rpts/mccluney_maxpop.html

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Mexican Drug War

Nov 22nd 2012, 16:34 by Economist.com


Mexican states compared with entire countries' body counts, murder rates and populations


MEXICO’S murder rate has doubled over the past five years, to nearly 19 per 100,000 people per year. But what does that really mean? To give an idea of how safe or dangerous the country's various states are, we have compared their crime statistics with those of whole countries. Visitors can relax in Yucatán, the safest state, which has about the same murder rate as Finland. Tlaxcala, not far from Mexico City, is about as safe as the United States. At the other end of the spectrum Chihuahua, the most violent state, has a murder rate equivalent to El Salvador, one of the most violent countries in the world. Another way of looking at the data is to compare the gross totals. The state of San Luis Potosí, for instance, has seen as many murders in the past year as all of Spain, despite having a population of just 2.6m.